ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026
Concussion: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewConcussion is a common form of mild traumatic brain injury affecting nearly two million people yearly, costing the US nearly 19 billion dollars annually. In light of such significant prevalence and disease burden, tools and interventions aimed at improving diagnosis, recovery, and management are constantly evolving. This narrative review synthesizes literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2015-2025), prioritizing systematic reviews, randomized trials, and consensus guidelines with the goal of summarizing current best-practices based on up-to-date data and expert opinion. RECENT
findingsConcussion remains a clinical diagnosis supported by tools such as the SCAT6, though limitations persist. Biomarkers demonstrate high sensitivity for intracranial injury, but limited utility for diagnosing uncomplicated concussion. Recovery is heterogeneous, influenced by initial symptom burden, patient factors, and mechanism of injury. Management has shifted toward early, symptom-guided activity and targeted, multimodal rehabilitation. Persistent symptoms reflect multifactorial etiologies that require individualized care. Concussion care is transitioning toward more objective assessment and personalized management, though gaps remain in diagnostic precision and in predicting prolonged recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.