Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42436444›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

How can patients with anxiety and/or depression maintain wellbeing following discharge from low-intensity interventions? A qualitative exploration of patient perspectives.

Saher Nawaz, Penny Bee, Cintia Faija

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saher NawazDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. saher.nawaz@manchester.ac.uk.
Penny BeeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Cintia FaijaDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Research for Patient Benefit Programme NIHR204037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 500 million people experience anxiety and/or depression globally, underscoring the need for accessible and sustainable psychological support. In England, Talking Therapy (TT) services provide cost-effective, evidence-based low-intensity interventions for mild to moderate anxiety and/or depression. Although over half of patients reach recovery by the end of treatment, relapse rates exceed 50% within one year, highlighting the importance of understanding how recovery is maintained post-discharge. This study examined current practices supporting the maintenance of treatment gains, identified factors that help or hinder sustained recovery, and explored opportunities to strengthen long-term relapse prevention support.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (N = 23) who met recovery criteria for anxiety and/or depression at the end of low-intensity treatment delivered across four NHS Trusts in Northern England. Data were analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore multilevel influences on recovery maintenance.

resultsFindings mapped onto CFIR domains. Within the intervention domain, relapse-prevention components were limited and inconsistently delivered, with many patients receiving only brief discussion or written materials. In the inner setting, discharge processes and follow-up practices varied, creating gaps in structured maintenance. Outer-setting influences such as employment stressors, bereavement, and access barriers hindered recovery. At the level of individual characteristics, memory difficulties, self-regulation demands, and reliance on social networks shaped the sustainment of treatment gains and wellbeing. Process issues included the absence of planned transitions to community resources, highlighting opportunities to strengthen support pathways. Participants proposed improvements spanning both clinical maintenance (e.g., routine follow-up, consolidation of skills) and personal recovery (e.g., enhanced social/peer networks and clearer community linkages) to promote long-term wellbeing.

conclusionThe study highlights the need to strengthen both clinical relapse-prevention practices and broader personal-recovery supports to enhance long-term outcomes following low-intensity psychological treatment. Although situated within NHS TT services, the mechanisms identified-self-regulatory maintenance processes, memory-related barriers, and social-network influences-are internationally relevant and align with global efforts to scale brief psychological interventions. These findings provide transferable insights for improving sustained recovery in diverse mental-health systems. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionDepressive DisorderPatient DischargePsychotherapyAdultEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingQualitative ResearchSecondary PreventionAnxietyDepressionLow-intensity CBTNHS talking therapiesQualitativeRelapse prevention

Identifiers

PMID42436444
PMCPMC13647811

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.