ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Short-term safety and preliminary patient-reported outcomes of bipolar radiofrequency therapy for mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction: a prospective single-arm pilot study.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition with multifactorial etiologies, including vasculogenic, neurologic, endocrine, metabolic, psychogenic, medication-related, and postsurgical causes. Bipolar radiofrequency (RF) therapy is an emerging noninvasive energy-based approach with potential restorative relevance in ED, but clinical evidence remains limited. This study evaluated the short-term safety, feasibility, and preliminary patient-reported outcomes of bipolar RF therapy in men with mild-to-moderate organic ED. Methods: This prospective, single-arm, open-label pilot study enrolled men aged 40-80 years with mild-to-moderate organic ED. Participants underwent six weekly treatment sessions using a handheld bipolar RF device (Forma applicator, InMode MD Ltd.). The primary endpoint was change in the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain (IIEF-EF) from baseline to 1 and 3 months. Secondary endpoints included Erection Hardness Score (EHS), Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), procedural discomfort measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and short-term safety assessed through adverse-event monitoring and directed symptom review. Results: Nineteen participants were enrolled, 18 contributed at least one post-baseline IIEF-EF assessment, and 17 completed baseline, 1-month, and 3-month IIEF-EF and EHS assessments. Two withdrawals were related to study burden and were not treatment-related. Mean IIEF-EF increased from 16.4±4.9 at baseline to 22.6±3.1 at 1 month and 23.7±3.1 at 3 months (overall P<0.001). Median EHS improved from 2.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 2.0-3.0] at baseline to 3.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.0) at both follow-up visits (overall P<0.001). At 1 month, all participants with available follow-up data reported improvement in erectile function and sexual activity on GAQ; at 3 months, 94.1% continued to report improvement in both domains. SEP Question 2 improved from 2/19 (10.5%) at baseline to 13/17 (76.5%) at 3 months, and SEP Question 3 improved from 2/19 (10.5%) to 12/17 (70.6%). No treatment-emergent adverse events or serious adverse events were documented. Mean procedural discomfort was 0.18±0.73, with a median of 0.0; all recorded discomfort scores were mild. Conclusions: In this prospective pilot study, bipolar RF therapy was feasible and well tolerated and was associated with favorable short-term improvements in patient-reported erectile function outcomes in men with mild-to-moderate organic ED. Given the single-arm, open-label design and short-term follow-up, these findings should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Larger sham-controlled studies with longer follow-up and objective physiologic endpoints are needed to define durability and clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.