ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026
Statistical inference for saved time based on disease progression curves in Alzheimer's disease research.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Saved time is an easy interpretation metric that provides information to patients on how long a new treatment can delay the disease progression in time as compared to the placebo. The frequently used projection approach for saved time estimation utilizes limited information from the available data. To address that limitation, the area above the disease progression curve was proposed to estimate saved time by using more information from data. However, it is a challenge to derive the closed-form statistical inference (e.g., confidence interval of saved time) as area above the curve is quadratic relative to visit time and saved time based on the curves is nonlinearly related to the area above the curve. In this article, we derived the closed-form variance of saved time based on the area above curve approach by using Taylor expansion. We then compared the performance of the closed-form method and the existing simulation-based method to construct the confidence interval for saved time based on the area above curve approach with regard to coverage probability and interval width under various scenarios. The simulation results indicate that the proposed closed-form method has similar performance as compared to the existing method, while the closed-form method can be computationally easy in practice without additional simulations in the existing method. Data from the completed phase 2 donanemab trial were used to illustrate the application of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.