Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437039›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2026

The evolution of diagnostic microbiology: integrating culture-based methods and genomic advances.

Mohsan Ullah Goraya, Ghayoor Fatima, Khizar Hayat, Ali Raza, Diao Yong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohsan Ullah GorayaSchool of Medicine Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Ghayoor FatimaDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Khizar HayatUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Ali RazaDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diao YongSchool of Medicine Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several decades, diagnostic microbiology has progressed from traditional culture methods to include modern, culture-independent molecular and metagenomic approaches for diagnosing infectious diseases and guiding antimicrobial therapy. Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, clinical diagnostic microbiology has made considerable strides in optimizing pathogen identification. This progress has been driven by the introduction of optimized sampling methods, advanced diagnostic kits, and new technologies like mass spectrometry for bacterial identification, real-time genomics, and adaptable culture systems. However, the costs of advanced molecular methods are very high, and they require massive instrumentation to reach a clinical diagnosis. Conventional cultures remain cost-effective and can be performed with minimal resource requirements compared to advanced laboratory equipment. However, the most significant challenge with conventional methods is the reporting time of results (several days). Since the newer molecular and genomic methods do not meet all the diagnostic demands, strategies have shifted toward employing techniques with higher precision, sensitivity, and better time efficiency. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning is set to redefine diagnostic paradigms, facilitating not only rapid and precise pathogen identification but also addressing foundational limitations in data analysis and interpretation. This review evaluates the synergy between conventional and emerging diagnostic technologies, emphasizing their clinical utility, limitations, and future trajectories for diverse audiences in microbiology and healthcare.

Indexed as

GenomicsMicrobiological TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesBacteriaHumansMachine LearningAI based clinical diagnosisConventionalCulture-basedDiagnostic microbiologyMolecular diagnostic techniques

Identifiers

PMID42437039
PMCPMC13355612

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.