ReviewBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Beyond the structure-function paradigm: A comprehensive review of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Review in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and regions (IDRs) challenge the classical structure-function paradigm by fulfilling essential biological roles in the absence of a stable three-dimensional fold. Rather than occupying fixed conformations, IDPs exist as dynamic ensembles that enable high-specificity, low-affinity interactions, multivalent regulatory functions, and context-dependent binding across diverse cellular environments. This conformational plasticity underlies their central roles in signaling, transcriptional regulation, chromatin organization, and the assembly of membrane-less organelles through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). The present review offers several conceptual contributions. First, we develop a cross-kingdom synthesis of disorder-based chromatin regulation, demonstrating that bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, plant transcription factors, and mammalian chromatin regulators share a conserved charge-regulatory logic, mediated by PTM-dependent mechanisms that dynamically couple environmental signals with genome organization. Second, we integrate mechanistically related but frequently siloed disease pathways, including mitophagy dysfunction, oxidative stress signaling, neuroinflammation, and aberrant phase separation, into a unified framework linking IDP conformational dysregulation to neurodegeneration and cancer. Third, we highlight underexplored regulatory dimensions of IDP biology, including proline isomerization and ubiquitylation-driven condensate formation, that influence conformational ensembles and signaling outputs in ways not captured by conventional structural approaches. Finally, we critically evaluate recent advances in AI-assisted disorder prediction and hybrid experimental-computational ensemble characterization, emphasizing both their transformative potential and current limitations. Dysregulation of IDPs underlies a broad spectrum of human pathologies, and we discuss the emerging opportunities and persistent challenges in targeting these conformationally dynamic proteins therapeutically, including through PROTAC-based degraders, condensate modulators, and ensemble-based drug screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.