ReviewJournal of surgical oncology2026
Bilateral Prophylactic and Contralateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in Women With Germline CDH1 Pathogenic or Likely-Pathogenic Variants.
Review in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) or contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) are considered in CDH1 carriers as a strategy to reduce lobular breast cancer (LBC) risk in women. In this study we aimed to evaluate the overall number of these procedures reported in literature. We conducted a literature search and a scoping review through the PUBMED database. We identified eleven studies eligible for our interest. Overall numbers, frequencies, geographic distribution, family history, and post-operative histopathological findings of BPM or CRRM were the main outcomes considered. Articles reporting information about BPM or CRRM were reported only in Europe and North America. A total of 75 (32.1%) women were treated with any mastectomy (BPM or CRRM), from a population of 234 positive at CDH1 genetic testing; 81.3% of these women, were treated in North America and 18.7% in Europe. In total, 69.3% of surgical procedures were BPM and 30.7% were CRRM; 76.9% of BPMs were performed in North America, and 23.1% in Europe. Instead, 91.3% of CRRMs were reported in North America, and 8.7% in Europe, respectively. A positive family history for BC was documented in 81.8% and post-operative histopathological findings described at least one in situ LBC in nearly all breast specimens. In conclusion, BPM or CRRM were performed in about 1/3 of women with germline CDH1 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants; studies were reported only in Western countries. Family history for BC in CDH1 carriers and detection of LCIS in post-operative specimens were also frequently described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.