Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438693›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026

Effects of Rehabilitation Interventions on Pain and Functional Outcomes in Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hala Mesbah Alruwaili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hala Mesbah AlruwailiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy related lumbopelvic pain is a major source of pain related disability during pregnancy, yet the therapeutic effectiveness of structured rehabilitation interventions in symptomatic populations remains incompletely defined. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through March 2026. Eligible studies included women with clinically relevant pregnancy related lumbopelvic pain receiving structured rehabilitation interventions. Primary outcomes were post intervention pain intensity and functional disability. Random effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals was performed where appropriate. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials were included in the qualitative synthesis. Four studies contributed to the pooled pain analysis, demonstrating significant improvement with rehabilitation compared with comparator conditions (SMD, -0.73; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.46; I²=38.7%). Four studies contributed to the functional disability analysis, which also favored rehabilitation (SMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.13), although heterogeneity was substantial (I²=75.9%). Secondary outcomes including symptom prevalence, work absenteeism, health related quality of life, and postpartum recovery showed inconsistent findings. Conclusions: Rehabilitation based interventions are associated with significant improvements in pain intensity and functional disability in women with pregnancy related lumbopelvic pain, with more consistent effects observed for pain outcomes. However, interpretation should remain cautious given heterogeneity, limited pooled evidence, and overall methodological constraints.

Indexed as

lumbopelvic painpelvic girdle painrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42438693
PMCPMC13356932

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.