Evidence mapPaperPMID 42438722Full record

ReviewKidney international reports2026

Mineral and Bone Disease in CKD and Kidney Transplantation: Controversies, Gaps, and a Path Forward.

Mehmet Kanbay, Ozgur Aktas, Sidar Copur, Tilman B Drueke, Ziad A Massy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet KanbaySection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozgur AktasDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sidar CopurDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tilman B DruekeDepartment of Nephrology, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique (UMRS) 1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint Quentin, Villejuif, France.
Ziad A MassyDepartment of Nephrology, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique (UMRS) 1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint Quentin, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) extends far beyond simple mineral imbalances. Evolving from the traditional understanding of secondary hyperparathyroidism, the conceptual framework has recently been updated to recognize 2 distinct but overlapping clinical syndromes: CKD-associated osteoporosis, which encompasses the significantly increased fracture risk and microarchitectural deterioration in this population; and CKD-associated cardiovascular disease, which accounts for vascular and structural cardiac abnormalities, including medial vascular calcification. Unlike traditional osteoporosis, the 2 clinical syndromes emerge from intricate interactions between declining kidney function and dysregulated mineral metabolism. The early rise in fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) levels; progressive phosphate retention; diminished vitamin D activation; secondary hyperparathyroidism; and uremic toxin accumulation, particularly uric acid and indoxyl sulfate, orchestrate profound disruptions in osteocyte, osteoblast, and osteoclast function. The complex interaction amplifies in the dialysis population, where protein-energy wasting affects most patients; and intensifies following kidney transplantation because of glucocorticoid, immunosuppressive, and anticoagulant treatments. Consequently, fracture rates in patients with CKD exceed those of age-matched controls by >4-fold, with patients on dialysis therapy facing a ≤ 8-fold increased risk. Available diagnostic and predictive tools need to be improved to adequately identify at-risk patients. The usefulness of additional, more recent biomarkers such as FGF-23, a-Klotho, and various bone turnover parameters remains a matter of debate. Bone biopsy, considered as the diagnostic gold-standard, remains impractical in routine practice. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) cannot provide information on the type of renal osteodystrophy. Moreover, it demonstrates limitations in the presence of severe vascular calcifications. Trabecular bone scores (TBS) emerge as potential progress in noninvasive bone imaging, showing modest superiority over traditional densitometry in predicting fracture risks among secondary osteoporosis populations, yet large clinical trials with long-term follow-up are required. Therapeutic management spans from parathyroidectomy to pharmacological interventions with bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide, romosozumab, whereas agents such as burosumab remain investigational, with no published clinical trials in this population. However, therapeutic nihilism persists, with most high-risk patients not receiving bone-targeted therapy despite accumulating safety data. Transforming care demands abandoning therapeutic nihilism, embracing personalized risk stratification, and conducting trials in populations historically excluded from bone health research.

Indexed as

burosumabchronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorderfibroblast growth factor-23osteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID42438722
PMCPMC13356695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.