Evidence mapPaperPMID 42438852Full record

ArticlePhysical activity and nutrition2026

Effects of exercise intensity on circadian rhythm and glucose regulation in adults with obesity: a randomized crossover trial.

Young-Im Kim, Jaesung Lee, Seokjun Cho, Jooyeol In, Minjae Seo, Jungmin Lee, Youngju Choi, Jonghoon Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical activity and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Young-Im KimDepartment of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaesung LeeDepartment of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seokjun ChoDepartment of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jooyeol InDepartment of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minjae SeoDepartment of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jungmin LeeDepartment of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Youngju ChoiInstitute of Specialized Teaching and Research, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jonghoon ParkDepartment of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jonghoonp@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of EducationNational Research Foundation of Korea 2023S1A5B5A17087591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCircadian rhythm disruption is associated with metabolic dysfunction and obesity. While exercise can serve as a non-photic zeitgeber, the optimal intensity for evening exercise sessions in adults with obesity remains unclear. This pilot crossover trial compared the acute effects of evening high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) on circadian core body temperature rhythm, 24-hour glucose regulation, and sleep quality in adults with obesity.

methodsNine adult males with obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², Asia-Pacific criterion) completed a randomised crossover trial of HIIT (~30 min at 90% heart rate reserve [HRR]) and MIIT (~50 min at 60% HRR) on a cycle ergometer between 19:00 and 21:00, separated by a 7-14-day washout. Twenty-four-hour core body temperature (ingestible telemetric capsule), interstitial glucose (FreeStyle Libre 1), and wrist actigraphy were recorded for 24 h before and 24 h after each exercise session under standardised dietary intake. The primary outcome was the change in circadian temperature amplitude (Δ amplitude) derived from a 24-hour fixed-period cosine fit with non-negative amplitude bound; mesor and acrophase were co-primary. Effect sizes (Cohen's d_z) are reported throughout.

resultsΔ amplitude differed in direction between conditions (MIIT -0.01 ± 0.19 °C; HIIT +0.12 ± 0.24 °C) but did not reach conventional statistical significance (paired t(8) = -2.19, p = 0.060, d_z = 0.73). Mesor (Δ contrast p = 0.49, d_z = 0.24) and circular acrophase (Δ contrast p = 0.67, d_z = 0.15) did not differ between conditions, with both protocols producing approximately one-hour phase advances. Twenty-four-hour mean glucose post-exercise trended lower following MIIT (95.9 ± 6.1 mg/dL) than HIIT (98.7 ± 5.5 mg/dL; p = 0.081, d_z = -0.72); coefficient of variation, time in range, and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions did not differ. Post-exercise sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and wake after sleep onset did not differ between conditions (all p > 0.50; |d_z| ≤ 0.24).

conclusionIn this single-session pilot crossover trial in nine adult males with obesity, evening HIIT and MIIT produced acute changes of similar magnitude in mesor and phase, with a borderline non-significant between-condition difference in amplitude change. Twenty-four-hour mean glucose showed a comparable non-significant trend toward lower values following MIIT, whereas glucose variability and sleep markers did not differ between conditions. Larger work-matched trials are required to determine whether evening exercise intensity produces clinically meaningful differences in circadian or metabolic outcomes in adults with obesity.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmcontinuous glucose monitoringevening exerciseexercise intensityglucose regulationinterval trainingobesity

Identifiers

PMID42438852
PMCPMC13358608

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.