ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2026
Use of corticosteroids in sepsis and infectious diseases: a narrative review.
Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critically ill patients with septic shock exhibit dysregulated host inflammatory responses. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) has been recognized as a potential contributor to poor outcomes in critically ill patients. CIRCI is characterized by dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which results in a state of systemic inflammation through altered cortisol metabolism and tissue resistance to corticosteroids, all of which may lead to systemic inflammation. Based on these pathophysiological mechanisms, the beneficial anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids have been proposed and evaluated in several clinical trials. However, evidence of the beneficial effects of corticosteroids has been evolving for years. While some studies have demonstrated beneficial outcomes, such as accelerated shock reversal, reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, and reduced mortality, other studies have failed to demonstrate significant mortality benefits. Such disparity in studies suggests the heterogeneity of critical illnesses and the difficulty in identifying optimal indications for corticosteroids. Recent studies demonstrated the beneficial role of corticosteroids in patients with severe COVID-19 and community-acquired pneumonia. Given the evolving body of evidence, this review discusses the utility of corticosteroids in critically ill patients, including those with sepsis, septic shock, COVID-19, and severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.