Observational studyCurrent medical imaging2026
Electron Density Dual-energy CT for Liver Metastasis Detection Compared with Conventional and Virtual Monoenergetic Images at 40 keV.
Observational study in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo estimate the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of liver metastases with electron density (ED) derived from dual-energy computed tomography and compare it with conventional and virtual monoenergetic images at 40 keV in both the unenhanced and portal-dominant phases.
methodsThis observational retrospective, single-institution study included 32 patients with 49 liver metastases originating from digestive adenocarcinoma. All patients underwent dual-energy computed tomography (Spectral IQON®, Philips Healthcare) during unenhanced and portal-dominant phases. Conventional, virtual monoenergetic (VMI) images at 40 keV and ED images were reconstructed. The CNR of each metastasis was measured for each reconstruction in both the unenhanced and portal-dominant phases. Comparisons between techniques were conducted using linear mixed model regression.
resultsForty-nine liver metastases were included. For unenhanced acquisitions, ED demonstrated a statistically significantly higher CNR than both VMIs at 40 keV (mean difference 12.56 [95% IC, 10.17 to 14.95], p < 0.001) and conventional reconstructions (mean difference 12.83 [95% IC, 10.44 to 15.55], p < 0.001). Similarly, in the portal venous phase, ED showed a significantly higher CNR compared with both 40 keV monoenergetic (mean difference 9.81 [95% IC, 7.42 to 12.20], p < 0.001) and conventional reconstructions (mean difference 16.62 [95% IC, 14.23 to 19.00], p < 0.001). Moreover, a significantly better CNR was observed between unenhanced ED and portal venous 40 keV VMI (14.4626 ± 7.5 vs 11.1810 ± 6.2, respectively; p = 0.007). DISCUSSION: Few studies have investigated electron density. These findings suggest that the CNR of liver metastases with ED is better than conventional and VMIs at 40 keV reconstructions, in both the unenhanced and portal-dominant phases. The single-center design and the small sample size limit the generalizability of these results.
conclusionElectron density provides a significantly better CNR for liver metastasis compared with both conventional and VMI at 40 keV reconstructions. Further studies are required to demonstrate that this gain in CNR improves the detection of hepatic metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.