ReviewCells2026
Emerging New Pathways in Malignant Neoplasms and Neurodegenerative Disorders: Perspectives for Therapeutics.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and malignant neoplasms are among the most prevalent age-associated diseases worldwide. Although cancer is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation, resistance to apoptosis, and metabolic reprogramming, AD and other neurodegenerative disorders such as Lewy body disease (LBD) including Parkinson's Disease (PD) and fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are defined by synaptic dysfunction, neuronal loss, neuroinflammation, and impaired proteostasis with misfolded protein aggregates. Despite these contrasting phenotypes, converging epidemiological and molecular data support an inverse relationship between cancer and neurodegenerative disorders, whereby a history of cancer is associated with reduced AD risk, whereas AD is linked to a lower incidence of multiple malignancies. These observations suggest that oncogenesis and neurodegeneration may represent divergent outcomes of shared biological processes dysregulated during aging. This conundrum likely reflects differential regulation of core cellular pathways governing cell survival, stress responses, metabolism, and genomic integrity but could also reflect the differential influence of aging pathways and secreted growth factors. Pro-survival and proliferative signaling pathways commonly activated in cancer, including PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling, altered p53 function, enhanced DNA damage tolerance, and anabolic metabolism, are often impaired in AD, LBD and FTLD, where neurons exhibit heightened vulnerability to stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, defective autophagy, and activation of pro-apoptotic cascades. Conversely, tumor-suppressive mechanisms that restrain proliferation may protect against malignancy but increase susceptibility to degeneration in post-mitotic neurons. Aging-related processes such as cellular senescence, immune dysregulation, and loss of proteostasis may further exert divergent effects in oncogenesis and neurodegeneration. This review aims to clarify associations between specific cancer types and neurodegenerative disorders, examine shared and opposing selected molecular mechanisms linking specific cancers and neurodegeneration, and contextualize these relationships within broader aging pathways (e.g., cell senescence, proteostasis). By integrating epidemiological, mechanistic, and therapeutic perspectives, we highlight unifying biological principles and translational opportunities at the intersection of cancer, neurodegeneration, and aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.