ArticleMycotoxin research2026
Distinguishing cytotoxicity-associated and direct immunomodulatory effects of enniatins and beauvericin in human immune and intestinal cells.
Article in Mycotoxin research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enniatins (ENNs) and beauvericin (BEA) are emerging Fusarium mycotoxins frequently detected in cereals and processed foods, raising concerns about their toxic potential. These cyclic hexadepsipeptides exert cytotoxic effects by disrupting ionic homeostasis and accumulating in lipid membranes. Although ENNs and BEA modulate pathways such as NF-κB and MAPK, their direct immunomodulatory effects remain poorly characterized. This study investigates their impact on inflammation, cytokine regulation, and metabolic activity in human immune (THP-1 Lucia™ monocytes) and intestinal (HCEC-1CT, Caco-2) cell models, including effects of phase I metabolites generated by S9 mix preincubation. In THP-1 Lucia™ monocytes, all tested ENNs (2.5-5 µM) and BEA (5 µM) suppressed lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-κB activity only at cytotoxic concentrations, suggesting that immunosuppressive effects are secondary to cell damage. Pre-treatment with rat liver S9 mix mitigated cytotoxicity and attenuated NF-κB suppression. In intestinal cells, ENNs and BEA reduced TNF-α transcription in non-tumorigenic HCEC-1CT but not in tumorigenic Caco-2 cells, indicating cell-type-specific responses. These findings emphasize the context-dependent immunotoxicity of ENNs and BEA and underscore the need to distinguish between direct immunomodulation and secondary effects of reduced cell viability. While broader immune disruption appears limited to toxic concentrations, TNF-α suppression in non-tumorigenic intestinal cells may pose a health concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.