Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440167›Full record

ReviewActa parasitologica2026

Blastocystis, an Enigmatic Parasite.

José Cebrián-Carmona, José Antonio Garrido-Cárdenas, Concepción Mesa-Valle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José Cebrián-CarmonaDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain. jcc851@ual.es.
José Antonio Garrido-CárdenasDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain.
Concepción Mesa-ValleDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blastocystis spp. is the most prevalent human enteric protist, yet its clinical significance remains controversial. Currently recognized as a genetically diverse stramenopile with zoonotic potential, it comprises at least 42 subtypes, of which ST1-ST4 account for most human infections. Despite more than a century of research, its pathogenic role and ecological interactions are still debated. We performed a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global scientific production on Blastocystis spp. from 1917 to 2025 using the Scopus database, retrieving 3710 publications. Temporal trends, geographic distribution, leading authors and institutions, and thematic evolution were assessed through keyword normalization and classification into five categories: classical diagnosis, PCR/molecular approaches, genetics/phylogeny, clinical/epidemiology, and microbiota. Results indicate a steady increase and a subsequent acceleration in publication trends since the late 1980s, with a compound annual growth rate of 11.56% between 1988 and 2025. Early research was dominated by microscopy-based diagnosis, whereas the introduction of PCR and sequencing technologies reshaped the field by enabling subtype identification and phylogenetic analysis. Since 2010, clinical and epidemiological studies have expanded significantly, and microbiota-oriented research has emerged as a growing line of investigation. Co-occurrence analysis indicates that Blastocystis spp. is frequently studied in the context of polyparasitism and intestinal coinfections. Overall, Blastocystis spp. research has evolved from descriptive parasitology to a multidisciplinary field integrating molecular, clinical and ecological approaches, highlighting the need for context-dependent models of host-parasite-microbiota interactions.

Indexed as

BlastocystisBlastocystis InfectionsAnimalsHumansPhylogenyBibliometric analysisBlastocystis spp.Microbiota.Molecular epidemiologyPCR and sequencingSubtypes (STs)

Identifiers

PMID42440167
PMCPMC13364866

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.