ArticleJMIR formative research2026
A Mobile Health Platform for Heart Failure Self-Management: Feasibility Study on Patient Engagement, Acceptance, and Potential Health Outcomes.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure is a chronic condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life and increases health care burden. Effective self-monitoring and lifestyle modification are essential components of heart failure management and can support improved health outcomes. Mobile health technologies, such as smartphone apps, are increasingly used to assist patients with heart failure in self-management. However, evidence regarding patient engagement, user experience, and the effectiveness of these mobile health tools remains limited and continues to evolve. Objective: This study aimed to explore the feasibility of a mobile health platform, MoTER-HF, which incorporates a smartphone app and a web-based clinical portal to support self-management in patients with heart failure. Methods: The feasibility study used a single-group pretest-posttest mixed methods design. A total of 23 participants diagnosed with heart failure were recruited to use the app and 2 Bluetooth-enabled measurement devices (a blood pressure monitor and a digital weight scale) over a 12-week period. Participants' engagement and acceptance were assessed using a satisfaction questionnaire, semistructured interviews, and platform usage logs. Potential health and behavioral outcomes were explored using validated instruments administered at baseline and week 12. Results: Most participants found the MoTER-HF app easy to use and aligned with their routine self-monitoring practices. Daily monitoring features such as blood pressure and weight tracking were used frequently. However, features such as symptom tracking and exercise logging were used less often, reflecting individual preferences and perceived relevance. Participants reported improved self-monitoring practices and valued the ability to visualize and track their data, and the reassurance provided through nurses' oversight in the satisfaction questionnaire and interviews. Changes in health and behavioral outcome measures were not statistically significant, although exploratory changes were observed in the scores of self-care, quality of life, and psychological well-being. Conclusions: The MoTER-HF platform has demonstrated potential in supporting self-management among individuals with heart failure, particularly when it incorporates features that participants find engaging. Further research is needed to better understand the platform's impact on health outcomes and the implementation challenges, and to involve clinicians in developing a scalable digital model of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.