ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
Avutometinib, Abemaciclib, and Fulvestrant in Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitor: A Single-Arm Phase I Trial.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe efficacy of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer is limited by resistance mechanisms, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation. We performed a phase I trial evaluating avutometinib, a dual rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma/MAPK kinase (RAF/MEK) inhibitor, combined with abemaciclib and fulvestrant. PATIENTS AND
methodsEligible patients had prior progression on CDK4/6i; prior fulvestrant was allowed. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Planned dose levels were abemaciclib 50, 100, or 150 mg orally twice daily, with avutometinib 2.4, 3.2, or 4 mg orally twice weekly (3 weeks on/1 week off) plus fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly every 28 days. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and progression-free survival (PFS).
resultsSixteen patients were treated (median age 61; 88% visceral disease; 63% prior selective estrogen receptor degrader). The MTD and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) were abemaciclib 100 mg twice daily, avutometinib 3.2 mg twice weekly, and fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly every 28 days. Common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were creatine phosphokinase elevation (50%), neutropenia (50%), diarrhea (44%), and skin rash (44%). No grade 4 to 5 TRAEs occurred. ORR was 13% (2/15 patients with measurable disease), 24-week CBR 40% (6/15 patients with measurable disease), and median PFS 3.6 months (95% confidence interval, 2.1-not reached). PK was consistent with prior reports.
conclusionsThe regimen was well tolerated at the RP2D, with no new safety signals, and showed preliminary clinical activity. A phase II trial is ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.