ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Dynamic evolution of readmission risk factors across short-, medium-, and long-term horizons in type 2 diabetes: a machine learning-based predictive modeling study with SHAP interpretability.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: T2DM readmission risk factors may evolve across time windows, but this dynamic remains poorly understood. Methods: This retrospective cohort study developed nine machine learning models to predict 30-day, 60-day, and 365-day readmission in 12,041 T2DM patients (with an additional 2,007 patients used for temporal validation of the 30-day and 60-day models). Feature selection was performed using LASSO and Boruta. SHAP analysis was used for interpretability, with temporal validation performed for short- and medium-term models. Results: ANN achieved the highest AUROC for 30-day and 60-day predictions. Random forest showed competitive performance for 365-day prediction. SHAP analysis revealed a dynamic evolution: age dominated the 30-day window; length of hospital stay and inflammatory markers (SII, SIRI) emerged as key predictors in the 60-day window; and diabetes-specific chronic complications dominated the 365-day window. Conclusion: Model selection should be time window-specific: ANN for short/medium-term, random forest for long-term prediction. Risk factors shift from acute vulnerability to inflammatory burden and then to chronic complications, supporting dynamic risk monitoring in T2DM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.