Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Dynamic evolution of readmission risk factors across short-, medium-, and long-term horizons in type 2 diabetes: a machine learning-based predictive modeling study with SHAP interpretability.

Lei Li, Sheng Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lei LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Sheng JiangDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: T2DM readmission risk factors may evolve across time windows, but this dynamic remains poorly understood. Methods: This retrospective cohort study developed nine machine learning models to predict 30-day, 60-day, and 365-day readmission in 12,041 T2DM patients (with an additional 2,007 patients used for temporal validation of the 30-day and 60-day models). Feature selection was performed using LASSO and Boruta. SHAP analysis was used for interpretability, with temporal validation performed for short- and medium-term models. Results: ANN achieved the highest AUROC for 30-day and 60-day predictions. Random forest showed competitive performance for 365-day prediction. SHAP analysis revealed a dynamic evolution: age dominated the 30-day window; length of hospital stay and inflammatory markers (SII, SIRI) emerged as key predictors in the 60-day window; and diabetes-specific chronic complications dominated the 365-day window. Conclusion: Model selection should be time window-specific: ANN for short/medium-term, random forest for long-term prediction. Risk factors shift from acute vulnerability to inflammatory burden and then to chronic complications, supporting dynamic risk monitoring in T2DM patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningPatient ReadmissionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factorsartificial neural networkdynamic risk factorsmachine learningreadmission predictionSHAPtemporal validationtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42440445
PMCPMC13333412

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.