ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
EStiMapp: A practical tool for mapping clinical symptoms evoked by electrical stimulation in intracranial EEG for epilepsy surgery.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Electrical stimulation of intracranial electrodes can map the patient's specific functional regions and seizure related symptoms. In our clinical practice, evoked functional symptoms and electrographic responses are manually annotated and visualized in a schematic electrode overview: an error-prone and time-consuming process. We here present an open-source graphical user interface (GUI) that standardizes the workflow and automatizes the visualization of intracranial EEG (iEEG) electrical stimulation results. Methods: We defined categories of evoked clinical symptoms based on a literature study and consensus session. A co-design team participated in brainstorm sessions to set the requirements of the GUI. We built the GUI and tested its usability with qualitative and quantitative assessments (System Usability Scales (SUS) questionnaires). Results: The workflow included standardized annotation of categories of evoked clinical symptoms in the iEEG software. The GUI visualized these evoked clinical symptoms in a 2D schematic overview, a 3D visualization of the brain with locations of evoked symptoms, and showed additional annotations per stimulated electrodes in a table. A mean SUS score of 82.3 (SD 9.2) was reached, which is considered excellent. Conclusions: We present an in-house developed workflow and graphical user interface (GUI) to categorize and directly visualize evoked clinical symptoms resulting from electrical stimulation on intracranial electrodes. Significance: Our open-source GUI facilitates standardization of the intracranial stimulation workflow and directly enables straightforward and uniform interpretation of evoked clinical symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.