ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Noninvasive prediction of TP53 mutation in prostate cancer based on advanced diffusion weighted imaging.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: TP53 mutation is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer (PCa). This study investigated whether stretched exponential model (SEM) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) could serve as a non-invasive predictor of TP53 mutation. Methods: This retrospective study included 84 patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy. Clinical, clinicopathological, and quantitative imaging parameters were compared between the two groups using the independent-samples t test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with TP53 mutation. Five logistic regression models were constructed: model 1 (based on DKI), model 2 (based on SEM), model 3 (based on mono-exponential model), model 4 (based on DKI, SEM and mono-exponential model) and model 5 (based on mean kurtosis (MK) value). Receiver operating characteristic analysis, DeLong test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and bootstrap internal validation were used to evaluate model performance. Results: Compared with the TP53 wild-type group, the TP53 mutated group showed significantly lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC), and mean diffusivity (MD) values and a significantly higher MK value (all Conclusions: MK value is an independent predictor of TP53 mutation in PCa. MK value-based model demonstrated good diagnostic performance and outperformed the SEM and mono-exponential model, suggesting that MK value may serve as a promising preoperative, noninvasive tool for assessing TP53 mutation status in PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.