ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the association between multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies and intervertebral disc herniation.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to investigate the potential association between 13 disease-modifying immunosuppressive drugs used to treat multiple sclerosis and intervertebral disc herniation, thereby filling a gap in pharmacovigilance research in this field. Materials and methods: We extracted adverse event reports from the FAERS database covering 2005 to 2025. Disproportionality analyses using four established algorithms (ROR, PRR, EBGM and IC) with unified predefined thresholds were performed. We also conducted subgroup analyses and explored the temporal characteristics of adverse event onset. Results: Teriflunomide, natalizumab and ocrelizumab have shown positive disproportionality signals for intervertebral disc herniation. And these signals merely reflect statistical associations and do not confirm causality. Among these, men and young-to-middle-aged adults populations presented relatively higher disproportionality signal values. Furthermore, teriflunomide-associated intervertebral disc herniation exhibits characteristics of early-onset risk, whereas there is no clear temporal clustering of events associated with natalizumab and ocrelizumab. Conclusion: Three medications demonstrated positive disproportionality reporting signals for intervertebral disc herniation, which require further validation. Clinicians are suggested to raise vigilance on spinal adverse events and tailor therapeutic strategies when prescribing these agents for multiple sclerosis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.