ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Effectiveness of the entire blood transfusion process with and without a clinical decision support system: a retrospective before-and-after study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support system in improving management of the entire blood transfusion process using a retrospective before-and-after comparative study. Methods: A closed-loop transfusion decision support system was developed and implemented hospital-wide in 2020 following a 1-month pilot. Outcomes before implementation (Jan 2018-Jun 2020) and after implementation (Jul 2020-Dec 2022) were compared, including documentation quality and completeness, documentation time, nursing satisfaction, and transfusion adverse events. Results: After implementation, completeness of transfusion records increased from 97.1% to 99.1% ( Conclusion: The system standardizes transfusion management, improves documentation completeness, reduces nursing workload, and enhances management of transfusion reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.