ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
An open-label, long-term extension, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of venlafaxine extended release in Japanese outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER), which has been administered for 52 weeks in Japanese adult outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Methods: In this open-label, long-term extension, multicenter study, 135 Japanese patients with GAD were enrolled after completing 10 weeks of treatment with venlafaxine ER or placebo (including tapering) during the preceding placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Venlafaxine ER 75-225 mg/day was to be administered to all participants for 52 weeks in this study. Primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events and suicidal ideation/behavior. Secondary endpoints included scores of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S), and Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement (CGI-I). Results: Venlafaxine ER was overall well-tolerated. Reported adverse events were in line with those reported in the preceding placebo-controlled, double-blind study. No serious adverse events or deaths were reported, and no tendency of venlafaxine ER to induce suicidal ideation was observed. No new safety findings were identified. A constant and consistent decrease in mean HAM-A total scores was observed (baseline: 15.9; Week 52: 8.0), as evidenced by a more pronounced change from baseline. Similar improvements were also observed in CGI-S and CGI-I scores, suggesting the effectiveness of venlafaxine ER with long-term use. Conclusion: The overall safety profile with long-term use of venlafaxine ER was consistent with the one previously observed, confirming the safety of long-term use of venlafaxine ER in Japanese adult patients with GAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.