ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of antenatal care providers about oral health care for pregnant women: a cross-sectional survey study in Shanghai.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs), nurses, and family physicians regarding oral healthcare for pregnant women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Shanghai, China, using an electronic questionnaire distributed to 770 OB-GYNs, obstetrics/gynecology nurses, and family physicians in Huangpu District. Results: The 459 respondents (59.6% response rate) showed suboptimal knowledge, especially about medication and fluoride safety during pregnancy, and inconsistent oral health practices such as infrequent fluoride toothpaste recommendations and limited comprehensive counseling, despite generally positive attitudes toward integrating oral care into routine antenatal services. Over 80% of OB-GYNs and family physicians reported routinely giving oral health advice, and over 82% of nurses and family physicians advised on specific hygiene practices, such as brushing and rinsing. A key finding was that a minority of participants across all professions (19.2-34.5%) considered oral care solely the duty of dentists. Conclusion: This study identified knowledge gaps and limitations in specific oral health practices among antenatal care providers in Shanghai, especially among non-OB-GYN providers, despite generally positive attitudes. These findings indicate that strengthening providers' knowledge and selected practice behaviors may be necessary to better support perinatal oral health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.