Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440945›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2026

Simulation-Based Education Versus Traditional Teaching for Nursing Students: A Systematic Review.

Suleman Shah, Ameer Afzal Khan, Mohammed Al Meqbaali, Rahman Syed, Anfal Khan, Mohsin Ali, Mohammed Al Sinani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suleman ShahFatima College of Health Sciences Al Ain Abu Dhabi UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3494-0385
Ameer Afzal KhanDepartment of Medicine Saidu Medical College Swat Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8378-1211
Mohammed Al MeqbaaliFatima College of Health Sciences Al Ain Abu Dhabi UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2023-5627
Rahman SyedDepartment of Medicine Swat Medical College Swat Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4227-0440
Anfal KhanDepartment of Medicine Saidu Medical College Swat Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.
Mohsin AliDepartment of Medicine Saidu Medical College Swat Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.
Mohammed Al SinaniDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion, and Reproduction Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-6153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Simulation-based education is increasingly used in nursing programs to enhance clinical competence, yet its effectiveness compared with traditional teaching methods remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based education compared with traditional teaching methods in improving knowledge, clinical skills, and related outcomes among prelicensure nursing students through a systematic review. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on August 18, 2025, for studies published. Eligible studies included prelicensure nursing students who compared SBE (high/low fidelity manikins, standardised patients, virtual/augmented reality, or serious games) to traditional education. The outcomes included knowledge acquisition, clinical skills, OSCE performance, satisfaction, confidence, and retention. We considered randomised controlled, quasi-experimental, and controlled before-and-after trials. Results: Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria (16 non-randomised, 14 randomised controlled trials). SBE was generally associated with improved knowledge acquisition and retention compared with traditional methods, with notable gains in CPR, vital signs, cardiac auscultation, and paediatric nursing, particularly in randomised studies. SBE groups also demonstrated superior clinical and procedural performance, including suctioning, nasogastric tube feeding, transfusion tasks, and OSCE scores, with some effects sustained at 1 to 3 months. Learner satisfaction and self-efficacy outcomes were variable; results generally favoured SBE in higher-quality studies, although several reported no significant difference. GPA outcomes showed no meaningful improvement. Conclusion: The available evidence, predominantly from quasi-experimental studies, suggests that SBE may offer advantages over traditional teaching in knowledge acquisition, clinical skills, and OSCE performance among prelicensure nursing students, though these findings should be interpreted in light of the methodological heterogeneity of included studies. Benefits on satisfaction and confidence were inconsistent. These findings support the considered integration of well-designed simulation into nursing curricula to advance competency-based education and patient safety.

Indexed as

educationlearningnursingsystematic reviewteaching methods

Identifiers

PMID42440945
PMCPMC13334674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.