ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026
Stem cell therapy for stroke: mechanisms, clinical translation, and future perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke remains a primary global driver of death and disability. Although acute revascularization therapies (intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy) have advanced, their narrow therapeutic windows result in persistent neurological deficits for many survivors. This necessitates restorative treatments during the subacute and chronic phases. Consequently, stem cell therapies (SCT) have become a central strategic focus, moving beyond the early hypothesis of direct cell replacement toward modulation of the post-stroke microenvironment. This review synthesizes the mechanistic evidence for various stem cells, primarily mesenchymal stem cells and neural stem cells, and evaluates the clinical landscape, which shows reliable safety but variable efficacy. Critically, the review addresses a fundamental translational barrier: the poor post-transplantation survival of stem cells, a limitation that has become a central focus of ongoing research. The discussion further addresses the paradigm shift toward cell-free therapies (e.g., extracellular vesicles) and innovative bioengineering strategies aimed at enhancing cell potency. Realizing the full clinical potential of these therapies for stroke requires addressing persistent challenges in standardization and translation through dedicated collaborative research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.