Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441920›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2026

The Role of Water in Protein-Ligand Binding: Decisive Factor, Annoying Feature, or Indispensable Control Element: In Any Case, a Major Challenge.

Gerhard Klebe

Abstract readPersonal Narrative
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gerhard KlebeInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-390X

Funding

European Research Council No. 268145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution began in water; it's not surprising that water had a profound influence on protein-ligand complex formation. However, water's contribution to binding is low, perhaps up to ±5 kJ/mol for displacement or recruitment. When affinity is factorized into enthalpy and entropy, a large scatter of both is observed, especially when both mutually compensate. Since this also applies to water, its impact can easily be overlooked and go unnoticed, especially when only affinity data are available. Nevertheless, water can enhance ligand affinity when a well-designed solvation shell assembles around the formed protein-ligand complex. Examples are discussed of pockets exhibiting varying water density in uncomplexed proteins, or transient pockets that only open with ligand binding. Are these pockets solvated before the ligand enters, or can the ligand penetrate without allowing water molecules to temporarily fill the pocket? Rules are needed to help medicinal chemists select the best optimization strategy while considering water's impact.

Indexed as

ProteinsWaterBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingThermodynamicsLigandsProteinsWaterchemistryimplicit solvationligandmoleculeprotein‐ligand bindingsolvationsolvation shell

Identifiers

PMID42441920
PMCPMC13363008

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.