ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026
Caregiver and Care Recipient Perspectives on Paediatric ED Mental Health Presentations: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore care recipients (patients' and their caregivers) and care providers (healthcare providers' and law enforcement officers') perspectives on paediatric mental health presentations to emergency departments, to identify challenges to care.
methodsSecondary qualitative analysis of free-text responses from a Delphi study conducted within the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network in 2022. The original Delphi process aimed to identify research themes and key data points for child and adolescent mental health ED presentations; however, a large number of additional free-text responses were received. The primary aim of this specific study was to identify major categories using the General Inductive Approach (GIA) of these free-text responses to explore the experiences, service delivery and perceived challenges of care recipients and care providers. Patients were recruited from 12 EDs across three Australian states, and pre-hospital services (two police and three ambulance departments) across four Australian states.
resultsA total of 184 participants provided responses (36 care recipients and 148 care providers). Three main categories are described: (1) care continuity and communication gaps, (2) challenges in the ED environment and (3) need for improved training and education and behavioural support.
conclusionsCare recipients and care providers identified challenges in service coordination, clinician readiness and the ED environment. Strengthening communication, expanding training, reducing sensory overload and improving privacy in physical EDs and improving links to community care could enhance patient experiences and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.