SynthesisInternational wound journal2026
Prediction of Factors Influencing the Incidence of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Classical Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers are among the most challenging complications of diabetes. Diabetes heightens patients' risk of severe complications, including amputations and death, while also driving up healthcare system costs. Given the significance of this problem, the present study conducted a systematic review of studies that used Classical Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to identify factors influencing the development of diabetic foot ulcers in individuals with diabetes. A thorough literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, covering their inception through 7 September 2025. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMAs) guidelines. Data were analysed narratively using content analysis. Eligible studies used predictive methods to identify factors associated with the development of diabetic foot ulcers. A total of 4396 articles were screened, and 66 studies were selected for full-text review after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review of these studies identified 95 factors associated with predicting diabetic foot ulcers, among which neuropathy, diabetes duration, age, body mass index and peripheral vascular disease were the most frequently reported. In addition, among the predictive models used in the studies, logistic and Cox regression models were the most useful for predicting factors associated with diabetic foot ulcers. This study identifies key predictive factors for diabetic foot ulcers, enabling healthcare systems to target high-risk patients through early screening. Proactive identification of vulnerable diabetic patients can prevent severe complications, such as amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.