SynthesisFamily process2026
The Stigmatization of Caregivers of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Family process, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)-related stigma has centered on individuals with the diagnosis. Evidence concerning caregivers exists but has not been brought together in a way that clarifies its scope, correlates, and implications, despite caregivers' central role in navigating services, supporting daily functioning, and treatment engagement. The present study therefore to systematically review the empirical literature on the stigmatization of caregivers of children with ADHD. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed and PsycINFO for studies between 2013 and 2024. Of the 4136 articles, 15 studies examining affiliate and courtesy stigma met criteria. Across studies, affiliate stigma was consistently linked to higher levels of caregiver depression, anxiety, and distress, as well as coping strategies and parenting styles. Higher education levels among caregivers were associated with lower affiliate stigma. The severity of the child's ADHD symptoms and internalizing/externalizing problems significantly associated with the level of stigma experienced by caregivers. Courtesy stigma was associated with several factors, including negative attitudes (e.g., anger or blame directed at children with ADHD) among members of the general public. These findings highlight the multifaceted associations of stigma on caregivers. The association between affiliate stigma and caregiver psychological distress underscores the need for targeted interventions, however only one intervention study met inclusion criteria for this review. The association between negative attitudes and courtesy stigma indicates the importance of addressing public perceptions. Future research should focus on developing and testing interventions that aim to reduce stigma and improve the well-being of caregivers and their families. Trial Registration: Prospero registration number: CRD42024527305.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.