Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443652›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Automated Deep Learning Segmentation and Quantification of Epicardial Adipose Tissue from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Validation and Clinical Implications.

Sepehr Nayebirad, Shayan Forghani, Soroush Nematollahi, Fatemeh Mahdavi Sabet, Amir Mohammad Vahdani, Negar Omidi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sepehr NayebiradTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5914-9227
Shayan ForghaniSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4341-1299
Soroush NematollahiTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-4763
Fatemeh Mahdavi SabetFaculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4589-9688
Amir Mohammad VahdaniCardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-1329
Negar OmidiCardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. negar.omidi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-1661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) sits directly on the heart and, in excess, has been linked to coronary artery disease and adverse cardiac events. Measuring its volume on cardiac CT could help with risk assessment, but doing it by hand is slow, demands expertise, and varies from one reader to the next. We set out to build a deep learning model that automatically segments EAT from coronary CT angiography (CCTA), estimates epicardial fat volume (EFV), and assesses whether that volume predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This study analyzed 286 coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images of patients aged 40 to 90. Sixty images were used for model training, while the validation and test sets each included 20 subjects. A 3D Residual U-Net model was utilized for segmentation. The model was trained using PyTorch and MONAI, and optimized with a Dice loss. Performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), while the Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman plots were employed to evaluate the agreement with manual measurements. We then evaluated the association of model-derived EFV and a combinatorial radiomic phenotype with MACE over 2 years of follow-up, using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. On unseen test scans, the model accurately segmented EAT, achieving a Dice score of 0.85. Automated and manual EFV agreed closely (Spearman r = 0.932, p < 0.0001; CCC = 0.943, 95% CI 0.864-0.977). To rule out volume compensation errors, an overlapping volume CCC was calculated and remained robust at 0.819. There was only a small bias on the Bland-Altman analysis. After accounting for established cardiovascular risk factors, isolated EFV was not significantly associated with MACE; however, a high-risk radiomic phenotype, characterized by concurrent low volume and high spatial heterogeneity, emerged as a strong, independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.04-3.17, p = 0.035). A 3D Residual U-Net can segment epicardial fat from CCTA quickly and accurately, producing volumes that closely match expert manual measurements and cutting analysis time from minutes to seconds. While epicardial fat volume alone did not predict adverse cardiac events, a radiomic phenotype representing a small, highly heterogeneous fat depot independently predicted MACE, highlighting the prognostic importance of EAT composition over sheer volume.

Indexed as

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)Deep learningEpicardial adipose tissueResidual U-NetSegmentation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.