ArticleBMC genomics2026
Navigating tradeoffs in variant filtering for population genetic and demographic inferences to inform management, conservation, and domestication in non-model marine bivalves: a case study in scallop.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile advances in high-throughput sequencing have facilitated the production of genome-wide data to illuminate genetic and phenotypic diversity and to inform management, conservation, and domestication of natural resources, the generation and processing of genome-wide variants obtained via high-throughput sequencing are prone to errors. Data filtering is an effective approach to improving data quality, but optimal filtering strategies have not been thoroughly investigated across species, especially for non-model aquatic invertebrates, such as bivalves, despite their high ecological and economic values. Given that bivalves have complex genomic architecture, exhibit special life history traits, and frequently experience drastic demographic changes, a comprehensive understanding of effects of variant filtering on downstream inferences is particularly needed.
resultsUsing whole genome sequencing data, we create a collection of filtered data sets representing a full range of filtering for mapping quality, read depth, genotyping quality, missing data, and minor allele frequency to conduct population genetic and demographic analyses for six representative natural stocks of an ecologically and economically important marine bivalve, Zhikong scallop Chlamys farreri. While population structure evaluation is robust to various filtering choices, different filtering strategies apply to assessments of individual inbreeding, genetic diversity, and demographic trajectory. For inbreeding estimation, we suggest adopting higher filtering thresholds for minor allele frequency while keeping filtering criteria for other parameters relatively relaxing. For genetic diversity calculation, we recommend systematically testing both data sets that include and exclude invariants within a sample site and clearly reporting the sets of loci included for evaluation. For demographic history reconstruction, filtering options that maximize the number of reliable variants are more appropriate.
conclusionsFindings from this study not only offer a reference for parameter settings in variant filtering for natural scallop stocks but also demonstrate a practical framework for how to navigate tradeoffs between data quality and quantity for other similar bivalves, such as oyster, clam, and mussel. Overall, our study provides a promising guideline for obtaining reliable genome-wide variants to instruct management, conservation, and domestication programs for non-model aquatic invertebrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.