ArticleBMC urology2026
Latent profile analysis of health-related quality of life in patients with bladder cancer and abdominal wall stomas: a multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abdominal wall stomas in bladder cancer patients can severely impact physical, psychological, and social adjustment. However, individual differences in patients' self-reported outcomes and their influencing factors require further investigation. This multicenter cross-sectional study aimed to identify latent profiles of health-related quality of life among bladder cancer patients with abdominal wall stomas and to examine demographic and clinical factors associated with profile membership.We evaluated 598 patients who underwent radical cystectomy with an abdominal wall stoma between September 2020 and September 2023 in the urology departments of five tertiary hospitals in Beijing, Henan and Jiangxi, China. Data were collected via a self-designed general profile questionnaire and the Chinese Patient Self-Reported Outcome Scale for Bladder Cancer with Abdominal Wall Stoma (PROS-BCAS). Latent profile analysis identified three patient subgroups: "Balanced high-quality type" (n = 339, 56.7%), "Unbalanced type" (n = 148, 24.7%), and "Low-level type" (n = 111, 18.6%). Significant differences were observed across the physical, psychological, social, and treatment-related domains among the three profiles. Multinomial logistic regression showed that lower monthly household income, out-of-pocket medical payment, limited stoma self-care ability, younger age, and complications were associated with membership in poorer health-status profiles. These findings indicate substantial heterogeneity in patient-reported outcomes among bladder cancer patients with abdominal wall stomas. Clinicians should prioritize vulnerable patients with socioeconomic disadvantage, insufficient stoma self-care ability, and complications, and provide targeted economic, educational, psychological, and social support to improve health-related quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.