Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444279›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2026

Targeting the Carotid Body Function With Big-K

Jimmy J Arevalo, Monique van Velzen, Simone C Jansen, Maarten van Lemmen, Elise Sarton, Albert Dahan, Erik Olofsen, Joseph F Cotten, Marieke Niesters, Rutger M van der Schrier

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jimmy J ArevaloDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-3373
Monique van VelzenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-6432
Simone C JansenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maarten van LemmenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8767-1824
Elise SartonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4403-3815
Albert DahanOutcomes Research Consortium, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-3945
Erik OlofsenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Joseph F CottenDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marieke NiestersDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2822-7509
Rutger M van der SchrierDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-3830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioids, most intravenous anesthetics and various illicit substances can cause fatal respiratory depression by depressing central respiratory networks. ENA-001, a ventilatory modulator targeting the carotid bodies, has emerged as a potential countermeasure without impairing analgesia or hypnosis. We conducted a literature review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ENA-001. This scoping review summarizes the current evidence base for ENA-001 from in vitro, animal experiments, and human volunteer studies. A comprehensive search was conducted across several electronic databases to identify all available literature describing its effects as a respiratory stimulant and as a reversal agent of drug-induced respiratory depression. We identified eight relevant publications, four describing data in humans and four using animal models (mice, rats, and non-human primates). ENA-001 increased ventilation and attenuated respiratory depression induced by morphine and the combination of xylazine and fentanyl. The primary site of action was localized to the carotid bodies, specifically the pore-forming α-subunit of the KCa1.1 (BK) channel. In humans, ENA-001 increased minute ventilation and reduced end-tidal carbon dioxide under poikilocapnic conditions. In experimental human models of alfentanil- and propofol-induced respiratory depression, ENA-001 significantly improved isohypercapnic minute ventilation and fully restored the hypoxic ventilatory response, respectively, without impairing sedation or analgesia. Across all studies, the safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported. In conclusion, ENA-001 is a first-in-class, peripherally acting respiratory stimulant that effectively reverses drug-induced respiratory depression. These findings support its continued clinical development for opioid- and anesthetic-induced respiratory compromise.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCarotid BodyPotassium Channel BlockersRespiratory InsufficiencyAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansTriazinesAnalgesics, OpioidGAL021Potassium Channel BlockersTriazinesBK (KCa1.1) channelcarotid bodyENA‐001opioid‐induced respiratory depressionrespiratory stimulant

Identifiers

PMID42444279
PMCPMC13365875

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.