ArticleMolecular ecology2026
Assessing the Evolutionary Potential of Endangered Populations Using Genomic Analyses of Selection in Ecologically Important Gene Regions.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolutionary potential, the capacity to evolve in response to environmental change, is important for the persistence of threatened species. This potential is diminished by genetic drift in small populations, causing the loss of genetic diversity and reduced efficiency of selection. We introduce an approach to evaluate evolutionary potential that integrates across these components by conducting genome-scale selection analyses of genes of ecological importance. We inferred selection in small populations of the endangered eastern massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus) by comparing summary statistics between background regions and focal adaptive gene families underlying the Major Histocompatibility Complex and venom protein phenotypes. We applied tests sensitive to selection at multiple timescales to populations that have experienced differential declines and compared results with an outbred population of the sister species, S. tergeminus. We detected signatures of selection in focal regions in the recent and distant past, suggesting balancing selection as a dominant force shaping genetic diversity underlying these traits. Recently declined S. catenatus populations exhibited weaker signals of recent selection, consistent with reduced efficiency of selection when effective population size is small. Drift has reduced genome-wide genetic diversity both in relatively large and recently declined S. catenatus populations compared to outbred S. tergeminus, but these reductions were less pronounced in focal adaptive regions. These findings suggest that selection has buffered the loss of adaptive variation, but that small populations of these snakes may be approaching a critical loss of evolutionary potential limiting their capacity to respond to human-induced environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.