ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2026
Machine Learning for Preoperative Prediction of Intraoperative Hypothermia in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative hypothermia (IOH, core temperature < 36.0°C) is common during gynecological laparoscopic surgery and is associated with adverse outcomes. However, predicting its occurrence using only preoperative indicators remains challenging.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery at a single center. Candidate predictors were extracted from electronic health records (EHRs). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was applied for feature selection. Logistic regression (LR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were developed and compared. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the model and identify key predictors.
resultsA total of 301 patients were included in this study, of which 118 cases (39.2%) developed IOH during gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Using LASSO regression, five predictors were retained: age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, basal temperature, estimated duration of surgery, and hypertension. The XGBoost model exhibited the best performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.980 in the training set and an AUC of 0.905 in the test set. SHAP analysis indicated that estimated duration of surgery was the most important predictive factor.
conclusionsThe XGBoost model best predicted IOH in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. SHAP analysis identified estimated duration of surgery as the most important predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.