Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444639›Full record

ArticleThe veterinary quarterly2026

Canine brain imaging with a new low-field portable (0.05 T) MRI scanner: a pilot

Elisabeth Maria Burgers, Samantha Miles, Ruben van den Broek, Chloé Najac, Beatrice Lena, Thomas O'Reilly, Andrew Webb, Stefanie Veraa

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The veterinary quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisabeth Maria BurgersDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Samantha MilesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ruben van den BroekDepartment of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Chloé NajacDepartment of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Beatrice LenaDepartment of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Thomas O'ReillyDepartment of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Andrew WebbDepartment of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Stefanie VeraaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prohibitive costs associated with high-field MRI systems have resulted in reduced access in resource-limited areas with consequential healthcare inequities. This has renewed interest in purposefully designed low-field (LF) systems that, despite inherently lower signal-to-noise ratios, have advantages in terms of cost, portability, and accessibility. This pilot study successfully translated a previously developed LF (0.05 T) MRI canine cadaver brain protocol for

Indexed as

BrainDog DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsDogsPilot ProjectsCanine neuroimagingHalbach arrayhydrocephalusimage contrastlow field magnetic resonance imagingone healthpermanent magnetssustainable imagingvisual grading characteristic analysis

Identifiers

PMID42444639
PMCPMC13371494

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.