ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Machine learning integration of routine inflammatory biomarkers for predicting remote punctate ischemic lesions following intracerebral hemorrhage: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Remote Punctate Ischemic Lesions (RPIL) occurring during the acute phase of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) represent a paradox of "ischemia within hemorrhage" that is associated with worse functional outcome. While the concept of "thrombo-inflammation" is gaining traction, the predictive utility of novel biomarkers like the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) combined with advanced machine learning (ML) remains uncharacterized. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study conducted between January 2019 and December 2025, 12,327 patients with ICH were initially screened, and 6,134 were included after strict exclusion criteria. The cohort was randomly split into training ( Results: LASSO regression identified six key predictors: Age, History of Diabetes, SII, D-Dimer, Glucose, and Fibrinogen. In the ML benchmark, XGBoost achieved the highest discrimination (AUC = 0.799), outperforming the Neural Network (AUC = 0.798) and standard Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.770). The derived nomogram demonstrated excellent calibration (Mean Absolute Error = 0.034) and clinical net benefit in Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Crucially, inflammatory and coagulation markers (SII, Fibrinogen) were identified as top-tier predictors, corroborating the immuno-thrombotic mechanism. Conclusion: We present a robust ML framework demonstrating that systemic inflammation and hypercoagulability are strongly associated with post-ICH ischemia. The XGBoost model offers precision, while the nomogram provides translational utility for bedside risk stratification. However, as this study relies on single-center data, future multicenter external validation is imperative to confirm the generalizability and clinical applicability of these models before broad implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.