ReviewRSC advances2026
Biodegradable polymer-based stents: materials, design, and biomedical applications.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, stents are used in the treatment of various vascular diseases particularly cardiovascular diseasesas well as in drug delivery and tissue support systems for organs that are compatible with stent geometry. The ability of stents to provide long-term, controlled, and localized treatment in the anatomical region where they are applied is one of their most important advantages in increasing clinical success. Therefore, stent technologies have been continuously improved from the past to the present, and different material-based stent formulations have been added to the literature. Although metal-based stents were mostly preferred in the past, the various disadvantages of these stents, such as corrosion, chronic inflammation, restenosis, and long-term side effects, have become increasingly debated. The existence of these limitations and side effects has led researchers to alternative materials, and polymeric stents have come to the forefront. Biodegradable polymeric stents, thanks to their decomposition into harmless degradation products after completing their targeted functions in the body, offer significant advantages such as eliminating the need for a second surgical intervention, and are considered a promising approach in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In addition, the ease of synthesis, high biocompatibility, adjustable mechanical properties, low toxicity, and wide variety of polymer materials have made them prime candidates for stent applications. Furthermore, polymeric stents offer customizable structures depending on targeted clinical requirements; mechanical strength, degradation rate, and drug release profiles can be optimized by combining different polymers. Thanks to a wide range of synthesis and production methods, polymeric stents can be developed in different geometries and functional formulations. This review article systematically classifies polymer-based stents found in the literature; the types of polymers used, their synthesis and production methods, and their biomedical application areas are discussed in detail. This study aims to provide a fundamental knowledge base on polymeric stents and to serve as a guiding resource for future research in this field.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.