Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444711›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Calibration of MRI-based reference intervals to new samples.

Andrew A Chen, Jakob Seidlitz, Margaret Gardner, Richard A I Bethlehem, Lena Dorfschmidt, Eren Kafadar, Andreana Benitez, Jens H Jensen, Simon Vandekar, Theodore D Satterthwaite and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrew A ChenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-6422
Jakob SeidlitzBrain-Gene-Development Lab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-7476
Margaret GardnerBrain-Gene-Development Lab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-0827
Richard A I BethlehemDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-0685
Lena DorfschmidtBrain-Gene-Development Lab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-1104
Eren KafadarBrain-Gene-Development Lab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0908-5624
Andreana BenitezDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-7809
Jens H JensenDepartment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-4287
Simon VandekarDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-9073
Theodore D SatterthwaiteLifespan Brain Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-9399
Aaron F Alexander-BlochBrain-Gene-Development Lab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6554-1893

Funding

Quantitative Neuroimaging Assessment of White Matter Integrity in the Context of Aging and ADR01AG054159 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Andreana Benitez · 2017 to 2026
$8.9M
Longitudinal Mapping of Network Development Underlying Executive Dysfunction in AdolescenceR01MH113550 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Danielle Smith Bassett, Theodore Satterthwaite · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
Inter-modal Coupling Image AnalyticsR01MH112847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Theodore Satterthwaite, Russell Takeshi Shinohara · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
Precision mapping of individualized executive networks in youthR37MH125829 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Damien A Fair, Theodore Satterthwaite · 2021 to 2026
$4.7M
Harmonization of Multi-Site Neuroimaging Data from Complex Study DesignsR01MH123550 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2020 to 2025
$4.0M
Reproducible imaging-based brain growth charts for psychiatryR01MH120482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER, SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Precision brain charts for imaging-genomics of schizophrenia and the psychosis spectrumR01MH133843 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Aaron Felix Alexander-Bloch · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054159NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112847NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113550NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120482NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123550NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133843NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH125829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference intervals, defined as intervals containing a new observation with a specified probability relative to reference data, would be clinically useful in assessing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain charts, which are estimates of MRI phenotypes across covariates such as age and sex, can be used to construct reference intervals. However, the reference data used to fit intervals often differ from a new sample in terms of study design, MRI acquisition, and image preprocessing. Application of MRI reference intervals to new samples remains a challenging problem. Here, we propose a new method called reference interval calibration via conFormal prediction (ReForm) that adjusts reference intervals for a new sample. Our method builds on recent work in conformal prediction, which yields intervals with guaranteed coverage for new observations. Through resampling experiments in Lifespan Brain Chart Consortium cortical thickness data, we compare ReFormed reference intervals with refitting intervals, statistical harmonization methods, and model-based adjustment of intervals. Notably for patient privacy concerns, ReForm does not require sharing of reference data. Yet, our empirical results demonstrate that ReForm controls FPR similarly or better than alternative methods that require sharing reference data. Finally, we provide recommendations for practical applications of ReForm and an R package (https://github.com/andy1764/ReForm) for calibrating reference intervals using ReForm.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebrain chartscortical thicknessreference intervalsstructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID42444711
PMCPMC13358719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.