ArticlePain reports2026
Experimenter-free pain assessment in mice using a thermal gradient ring and functional linear models.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional preclinical laboratory animal tests of pain can be suboptimal for many reasons, such as experimenter bias, interference of motor effects, and a lack of emotional or motivational pain process engagement. These shortcomings may also impede the search for novel pain therapies. Recently, thermal preference or gradient tests have gained popularity, and several apparatuses are either commercially available or can be self-made. The thermal gradient ring (TGR) offers a high-resolution thermal preference assessment and removes spatial confounds that may arise in two-chamber or linear designs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the TGR as a tool to assess pharmacotherapies and develop an appropriate statistical framework for data analysis. Methods: We examined the effects of 17 treatment conditions, including pronociceptive and antinociceptive compounds, in male and female mice. Behavioral data were analyzed using functional linear models (FLM), enabling hypothesis testing of temperature preference and motor activity at each timepoint of the TGR session. Results: Functional linear models captured the temporal dynamics and magnitudes of treatment effects and identified locomotor side effects that were obscured by traditional session-averaged analyses. Minute-by-minute comparisons revealed distinct temporal progressions of treatment effects and locomotor side effects. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that the TGR-FLM combination is a robust framework and a valuable tool for screening novel pain therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.