ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: A case series on actionable genomic alterations guiding effective targeted therapy in rare sarcomas.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Advanced sarcomas have limited systemic therapy options, but genomic profiling can uncover actionable mutations. This case series illustrates the promise and limitations of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and targeted therapies in clinical practice across three sarcoma histologies. Case presentations: Case 1: A 36-year-old woman received local therapies for an angiosarcoma in her breast. Six months later, she developed osseous metastatic disease, and NGS revealed a Discussion: Three patients with advanced sarcomas achieved partial responses to NGS-guided targeted therapies, with disease control lasting from 1 to over 5 years. Two cases involved novel, targetable mutations not previously identified in these sarcoma subtypes. However, the limitations of targeted therapies are highlighted by one patient's lack of response to a novel ROS1 G2032R-directed treatment, and another patient's repeated oligometastatic progression despite using an ALK inhibitor without resistance mutations. Simply suppressing a driver-mutation clone with targeted therapy may be insufficient for long-term disease control in sarcoma. Local therapies can be critical adjuvants in achieving improved outcomes for aggressive sarcomas. We recommend careful consideration of NGS testing for all sarcomas as we continue to explore their vast mutational landscape, response to targeted therapies, and mechanisms of resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.