ReviewMedComm2026
Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Genome Editing: Challenges, Innovations, and Future Perspectives.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic genome editing has advanced rapidly with the development of diverse programmable nucleases, from zinc-finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases to clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based systems such as base and prime editors. Despite these breakthroughs, clinical translation remains constrained by the challenge of achieving safe, efficient, and tissue-specific delivery. Viral vectors, particularly adeno-associated viruses, have enabled durable editing in selected organs but are limited by their restricted cargo capacity, immunogenicity, and complex manufacturing. Nonviral platforms, most notably ionizable lipid nanoparticles, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy for hepatic targets, with clinical trials reporting up to 93% protein knockdown after a single dose. An expanding set of emerging modalities, including virus-mimicking nanosystems, cell-derived extracellular vesicles, cell-penetrating peptides, and intelligent-responsive multifunctional scaffolds, further enriches the delivery toolbox by supporting transient expression and programmable targeting across diverse editors and tissues. Parallel advances in high-throughput barcoded screening and machine learning are accelerating vector optimization, while rational chemical modification of payloads improves in vivo stability and specificity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current and emerging delivery systems for genome editing, highlighting key innovations, unresolved challenges, and interdisciplinary strategies poised to unlock broader therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.