ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Dental Students' and Educators' Perceptions Toward the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: A Survey-Based Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dental Students' and Educators' Perceptions Toward the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: A Survey-Based Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into dentistry has the potential to transform dental education, clinical training, and research. However, the perspectives of direct stakeholders remain underexplored. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe current knowledge, perceptions, and self-reported usage patterns of AI tools among dental students and faculty at a single institution and to identify specific educational needs and barriers to curriculum integration. Methodology: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was distributed both online and in-person to dental students and educators. The survey collected demographic data and included closed-ended items addressing knowledge, perception, and attitudes toward the adoption of AI in dental education. Descriptive statistics and comparative analyses were performed to identify differences across roles, gender, and academic levels. Results: The study included 333 dental students and 55 faculty members, with a higher proportion of females (53.4%). Most participants were familiar with AI, with significant differences in knowledge levels across academic years ( Conclusion: Both dental students and faculty demonstrated high awareness and positive perceptions regarding AI use and relevance to dental education. The majority expressed strong interest in receiving formal training on AI applications through structured lectures, workshops, and courses. These findings suggest stakeholders' readiness for AI curriculum integration and indicate a need for curriculum development and establishment of ethical guidelines to support future AI integration, though the extent to which such training would influence educational or clinical outcomes remains to be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.