Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445132›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology research and practice2026

Pharmacological Modulation of Perioperative Pain in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Intravenous Lidocaine, Dexmedetomidine, Opioid-Free and Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia, and ERAS-Based Protocols.

Carlos Zavaleta-Corvera, Erick Auccacusi Pachari, Julian Espinoza-Portilla, Wendy Farfán-Martinez, Mario Bolarte-Arteaga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos Zavaleta-CorveraFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Lima, Peru, ucsur.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-8261
Erick Auccacusi PachariFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Lima, Peru, ucsur.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5043-2552
Julian Espinoza-PortillaFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Lima, Peru, ucsur.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8923-4606
Wendy Farfán-MartinezFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Lima, Peru, ucsur.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6067-6702
Mario Bolarte-ArteagaFaculty of Medicine, Continental University, Lima, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9939-8917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is associated with specific analgesic challenges because opioid-related adverse effects may be especially relevant in patients with obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, and cardiometabolic comorbidities. Inadequate perioperative analgesia in this population may impair early mobilization and functional recovery, while excessive opioid use increases the risk of respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and prolonged hospital stay. This narrative review synthesizes and critically appraises contemporary evidence on intravenous lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, opioid-free or opioid-sparing anesthesia, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-based perioperative strategies in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from January 2018 to May 2026. A total of 41 studies were included, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational studies, pharmacokinetic investigations, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and ERAS implementation studies. Methodological quality was appraised using RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, and AMSTAR-2 according to study design. Evidence for intravenous lidocaine remains heterogeneous and appears dependent on dosing strategy, infusion duration, and perioperative context; its antiemetic and anti-inflammatory effects may be more consistent than its analgesic benefit when infusion is limited to the intraoperative period. Dexmedetomidine has been associated with reductions in perioperative opioid exposure and PONV through alpha-2-mediated sympatholysis and opioid-sparing mechanisms, although effects on pain scores are variable and hemodynamic monitoring is required. Opioid-free or opioid-sparing strategies may reduce opioid exposure and PONV, but superiority over conventional anesthesia for pain control or length of stay is inconsistent, and protocol heterogeneity limits generalizability. ERAS pathways represent the most comprehensive and evidence-supported framework for perioperative optimization, with benefit proportional to adherence and independent of any single pharmacologic agent. These pharmacologic strategies are best understood as mechanism-based adjuncts to be selectively integrated within high-adherence ERAS programs, not as universal standalone interventions. Rigorous multicenter randomized trials with standardized dosing, detailed ERAS adherence reporting, patient-centered outcome measures, and subgroup analyses by procedure type, OSA status, and PONV risk are needed.

Indexed as

bariatric anesthesiadexmedetomidineenhanced recovery after surgeryintravenous lidocainemultimodal analgesiaopioid-free anesthesiaopioid-sparing anesthesiapostoperative nausea and vomitingpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID42445132
PMCPMC13358357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.