Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445139›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Identification and validation of novel candidate genes with diagnostic value for sepsis via weighted gene co-expression network analysis.

Xue Fu, Jian Yang, Qin Lv, Xiaotian Zhang, Sen Wang, Shangkun Cai, Meng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xue Fu *Department of Emergency, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jian Yang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qin LvDepartment of Emergency, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaotian ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Sen WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Shangkun CaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Meng ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response caused by a variety of causes, which is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Our work aimed to screen the candidate genes of sepsis and evaluate their diagnostic value using bioinformatics tools. Methods: Multiple GEO datasets were integrated. GSE9960 and GSE28750 were merged as the training set, with other datasets used as validation sets for immune infiltration, prognosis, ROC analysis, subtype analysis, and single-cell analysis. Sepsis-associated genes were identified via weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Functional enrichment was explored using GSVA and GSEA. Diagnostic potential was evaluated by ROC curves. Correlation between gene expression and immune cells was analyzed by Pearson correlation, and gene expression was validated by qRT-PCR. Results: WGCNA identified 1,463 sepsis-associated genes, which were enriched in biosynthesis/metabolism and immune-related signaling pathways. Five hub genes ( Conclusion: In this study, we identified five sepsis-associated genes (

Indexed as

bioinformatics analysiscandidate genesdiagnostic valueimmune cell infiltrationsepsis

Identifiers

PMID42445139
PMCPMC13357434

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.