Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42445236›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Development and validation of a parent-proxy bronchiectasis child quality-of-life instrument: the BC-QoL.

Jack M Roberts, Peter A Newcombe, Vikas Goyal, Sanjeewa Kularatna, Steven M McPhail, Anne B Chang, Julie M Marchant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jack M RobertsAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-4725
Peter A NewcombeSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Vikas GoyalAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7533-2315
Sanjeewa KularatnaAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Steven M McPhailAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Anne B ChangAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-3706
Julie M MarchantAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL), the highest prioritised outcome by children with bronchiectasis and their parents, is a patient-reported outcome measure increasingly considered essential when evaluating health and interventions. Despite this, there are no validated instruments that specifically measure QoL related to bronchiectasis in children. We aimed to develop and validate a new bronchiectasis child-specific parent-proxy QoL instrument (BC-QoL). Methods: We developed a draft 44-item BC-QoL and subsequently conducted a prospective cohort study in which 142 parents completed the draft BC-QoL and six other measures (two validated cough scores; the Parent-proxy Children's Acute Cough-specific QoL questionnaire; the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21-items; the RAND-36; and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™ 4.0)) to assess the convergent and discriminant validity of the BC-QoL. The questionnaires were completed over 3 weeks at different phases of a child's illness (stable state, exacerbation and/or recovery). Responses were analysed using psychometric and clinical impact techniques to reduce the number of items and determine the instrument's reliability and validity. The minimal important difference (MID) was also calculated. Results: The final 23-item BC-QoL instrument with its three domains (emotional, physical and social well-being) demonstrated high split-half reliability (0.95), Cronbach's alpha (0.97), repeatability (intraclass coefficient 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.82), validity and responsiveness. BC-QoL's domains significantly correlated with those of the PedsQL™ 4.0 (Spearman correlations: emotional=0.43, social=0.41, physical=0.47). BC-QoL's MID ranged from 0.74 to 1.32. Conclusion: This study provides evidence supporting the validity and reliability of BC-QoL. The BC-QoL can be used to evaluate the impact and effectiveness of interventions and better understand the disease burden among children with bronchiectasis.

Identifiers

PMID42445236
PMCPMC13358714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.