ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
From enhancement to over-reliance: a mixed-method study of generative AI and sustainable learning performance.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education has raised important questions regarding its impact on student learning outcomes. While prior research has primarily focused on AI adoption, limited attention has been given to its influence on sustainable learning performance and the potential risks associated with its use. Addressing this gap, this study develops a comprehensive model to examine both the positive and negative effects of AI use on learning by integrating AI literacy, self-regulated learning, cognitive offloading, and individual differences. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining time-lagged survey data collected in three waves from 623 university students in China with qualitative interviews conducted with educators. The quantitative data were analyzed using PLS-SEM, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis to provide deeper insights into the observed relationships. The findings reveal that AI literacy significantly enhances critical AI evaluation, which, along with self-regulated learning, promotes effective AI use. Effective AI use positively influences sustainable learning performance but also increases AI over-reliance, which negatively affects learning outcomes. Furthermore, polychronicity moderates key relationships, indicating that multitasking tendencies shape both AI dependency and learning effectiveness. The qualitative findings support and explain these results, highlighting the behavioral mechanisms underlying AI-supported learning. Overall, the study demonstrates that the impact of AI on learning is dual in nature and depends on how students engage with the technology, offering important implications for theory and educational practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.