ArticleJAMIA open2026
Develop and validate a fair machine learning model to identify patients with high data-continuity in electronic health records data.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Electronic health record (EHR) data discontinuity, defined as receiving care outside of a particular EHR system, may cause misclassification of study variables. We aimed to: (1) quantify misclassification across levels of EHR data discontinuity and identify an optimal continuity threshold, (2) develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict EHR continuity and optimize fairness across racial and ethnic groups, and (3) externally validate the EHR continuity prediction model using an independent dataset. Materials and Methods: We used linked OneFlorida+ EHR-Medicaid claims data for model development and Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet) EHR-Louisiana Blue Cross Blue Shield (LABlue) claims data for external validation. A Harmonized Encounter Proportion Score (HEPS), adapted from prior continuity metrics, was applied to quantify patient-level EHR data continuity and the impact on misclassification of 42 clinical variables. Machine learning models were trained using routinely available demographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization features derived from structured EHR data. Results: Higher EHR data continuity was associated with lower rates of misclassification. A HEPS threshold of approximately 30% effectively distinguished patients with sufficient data continuity. Machine learning models demonstrated strong performance in predicting high continuity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.77). Fairness assessments showed bias against Hispanic group, which was substantially improved following bias mitigation procedures. Model performance remained robust and fair in the external validation. Discussion: Our study offers a practical metric for quantifying data continuity in EHR networks. The current ML model incorporating EHR-routinely collected information can accurately identify patients with high care continuity. Conclusions: We developed a generalizable data-continuity classification tool that can be easily applied across EHR systems, strengthening the rigor of EHR-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.