ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Artificial intelligence-based models for colorectal cancer diagnosis using laboratory tests: an exploratory retrospective case-control study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is frequently diagnosed at advanced stages owing to the insidious nature of its early clinical manifestations and the lack of validated screening modalities. This diagnostic delay presents a substantial therapeutic challenge, underscoring the need to develop population-based screening strategies. Based on laboratory data, this study constructed a diagnostic model for CRC to explore a screening strategy for population-based tumor census. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, we analyzed anonymized laboratory parameters and baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with histologically confirmed CRC and age-matched healthy controls undergoing routine health checkups at our tertiary care center between January 2021 and December 2022. Non-parametric comparisons between groups were conducted using the Mann-Whitney Results: After rigorous screening, this study included 1,068 patients with histologically confirmed CRC and 1,068 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Comparative analysis using the Mann-Whitney Conclusions: An effective risk stratification model for CRC screening was developed using routine clinical laboratory parameters and the readily available demographic variable of age. However, being derived from a single-center retrospective cohort, the model requires further validation in multi-center, prospective studies to confirm its generalizability and mitigate potential overfitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.